WHO and many national health authorities neglected scientific evidence from the beginning
28.01.2010: It seems, that the World Health Organisation (WHO) followed other logic than that of scientific evidence in public health.
A one-sided molecular view and dominating veterinary influence have obviously shaped the threatening fictive model of some future pandemic for the WHO.
But can we exclude, that this agenda setting has not just been created under sponsorship of clever marketing specialists of the Big Pharma, instrumentalising WHO's public-private health partnerships for their shareholders?
Here some important facts by the senior WHO epidemiologist James Chin, who enlightens the background of the WHO's pandemic alarm. His statements were part of an article in "Los Angeles Times", written by Michael Fumento and published on the 14th of June 2009, three days after WHO General Secretary Margaret Chan declared level 6 of a global "pandemic": fumento.com/swineflu/who.html
WHO just seems to have disregarded all critics, lots of information and a big amount of arguments and evidence existing and being published.
General secretary Margaret Chan is responsible for inducing a media driven campaign, fostering panic and irrational fears to rise the public willingness to take a vaccine all over the globe.
And here a recent review by Michael Fumento on the same topic
Here another document prooving the ignorance of WHO and its tendency to follow pharma interests:
01.02.2010 | Eine öffentliche parlamentarische Anhörung mit dem Titel "Der Umgang mit der H1N1-Pandemie: Ist mehr Transparenz erforderlich?" hat am 26. Januar am Rande der Plenarsitzung der Parlamentarischen Versammlung des Europarates stattgefunden. Einige Mitglieder der Versammlung – darunter der scheidende Vorsitzende des Unterausschusses der PACE für Gesundheit, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg (Deutschland, SOC) - Initiator des Berichtes – forderten in einem Antrag im Dezember, dass die Versammlung diese Frage behandele. Die Anhörung stand für die Presse offen. Sowohl die Anhörung, als auch die Pressekonferenz wurden live im Internet übertragen. Hier der Beitrag von Herrn Dr. Wodarg (auf Englisch):
(Nachrichten) 
06.01.2011 | Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE): The protection of journalists’ sources of information is a basic condition for both the full exercise of journalistic work and the right of the public to be informed on matters of public concern. In a large number of cases, public authorities have forced, or attempted to force, journalists to disclose their sources, despite the clear standards set by the European Court of Human Rights and the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe. Download report, recommendation and explanatory memorandum here =>