EUROPARAT/Paris: 2. Anhörung zum Pandemie-Fehlalarm der WHO
01.04.2010: Wenn das nächste Mal wegen einer Pandemie Alarm geschlagen wird, wird die große Mehrheit dies nicht ernst nehmen'', so die Botschaft an die Teilnehmer einer Anhörung zum Umgang mit der H1N1-Pandemie am 29. März in Paris, die vom Ausschuss der Parlamentarischen Versammlung für Soziales, Gesundheit und Familie veranstaltet wurde. Leider ist die WHO einer Einladung zur Anhörung diesmal nicht nachgekommen.
Hier die Pressemitteilung des Europarates auf Englisch und die wichtigsten Links mit den Aufzeichnungen der Anhörung, der Pressekonferenz und den vorgelegten Textentwürfen sowie den Beiträgen der eingeladenen Experten.
Der Sozial- und gesundheitsausschuss der Parlamentarischen Versammlung des Europarates bei der 2. Anhörung zum Pandemie-Fehlalarm der WHO
Social, Health and Family Affairs:
Paris, 29.03.2010 - "The next time someone cries wolf over a pandemic, the overwhelming majority will not take it seriously,” participants were told today at a parliamentary hearing on the handling of the H1N1 pandemic, organised in Paris by PACE’s Social, Health and Family Affairs Committee.
"A pandemic cannot be whatever the WHO declares it is. If it turns out that former PACE member Wolfgang Wodarg was right when he said the pandemic was decided to help the pharmaceutical industry make bigger profits, this might well turn out to be one of the biggest health scandals ever,” said Paul Flynn (United Kingdom, SOC), PACE rapporteur on this issue.
Participants also expressed regret at the WHO’s failure to revise its position on the pandemic, and warned against a possible repetition of events if no lessons were learnt. "The world no longer trusts the WHO, but we need a body of this kind and it must therefore restore its own credibility,” Mr Flynn added.
He paid tribute to the rare courage of the Polish Health Minister Ewa Kopacz, who had refused to be held hostage by the pharmaceutical industry and did not order vaccines. She said that drug company profit should not be more important than people.
She urged the WHO to urgently re-examine their position and decrease the pandemic alert level. She also denounced the lack of solidarity among European states when the pandemic was declared and the lack of co-ordination at EU level. Marc Gentilini, an expert in infectious diseases who is a former President of the French Red Cross, regretted that there was no such thing as a European health policy and called for the building of what he called a Europe of Health: "The precautionary principle is not a political umbrella to be abused,” he said.
Health researcher Tom Jefferson, of the independently-funded Cochrane Collaboration, stressed that parliamentary democracy was the best means of ensuring that private interests do not prevail over the sovereignty of states: "We trust democracy to have a surveillance system that works. The public health sector may not rely on privatised expertise,” he warned, underlining that so-called experts did not emerge like daisies but were "created and made into key opinion-leaders”.
Michèle Rivasi, a member of the Green Group in the European Parliament, who is calling for an inquiry by MEPs into the handling of the ‘flu pandemic, illustrated what she called "the chronicle of a pandemic foretold” and denounced the rush with which the WHO had announced the pandemic. She asked whether we were getting the whole truth from the WHO. She said it was important for PACE and the European Parliament to work together on this issue.
The participants also regretted that the WHO had not accepted the invitation to participate in this second hearing.
Hier die Original-Seite des EUROPARATES mit allen Links und englischem Text..
Copyright der hier verlinkten und gezeigten Dokumente beim EUROPARAT (©CoE)





