WHO and many national health authorities neglected scientific evidence from the beginning
28.01.2010: It seems, that the World Health Organisation (WHO) followed other logic than that of scientific evidence in public health.
A one-sided molecular view and dominating veterinary influence have obviously shaped the threatening fictive model of some future pandemic for the WHO.
But can we exclude, that this agenda setting has not just been created under sponsorship of clever marketing specialists of the Big Pharma, instrumentalising WHO's public-private health partnerships for their shareholders?
Here some important facts by the senior WHO epidemiologist James Chin, who enlightens the background of the WHO's pandemic alarm. His statements were part of an article in "Los Angeles Times", written by Michael Fumento and published on the 14th of June 2009, three days after WHO General Secretary Margaret Chan declared level 6 of a global "pandemic": fumento.com/swineflu/who.html
WHO just seems to have disregarded all critics, lots of information and a big amount of arguments and evidence existing and being published.
General secretary Margaret Chan is responsible for inducing a media driven campaign, fostering panic and irrational fears to rise the public willingness to take a vaccine all over the globe.
And here a recent review by Michael Fumento on the same topic
Here another document prooving the ignorance of WHO and its tendency to follow pharma interests:
06.09.2008 | Europa ist viel größer als die Europäische Union: Anlässlich des heutigen Besuches des Generalsekretärs des Europarates Terry Davis in der Region Flensburg-Schleswig möchte ich auf diese wichtige gesamteuropäische politische Organisation aufmerksam machen. In Deutschland ist der Europarat ein weithin unbekanntes Wesen, was vor allem an der Vernachlässigung durch Medien liegt.
(Nachrichten)